While editing another batch of stories for e-book publication, I ran into this section of "The Cthulhu Orthodontist," which I wrote for the anthology Cthulhu and the Coeds: Or, Kids and Squids. It's a story about how the divorced father of the young teenager writes two screenplays to help raise money for her orthodontist bill. Sounds simple enough, but it's a story about stories and storytelling and how the making of stories affects our lives in all sorts of ways at all sorts of levels.
This passage explains what Andrew Ulaszek, the dad, writes when he believes that the announced production of "The Call of Cthulhu" is legit and that macabre master Mario Bava is slated to direct:
"Dad
kept the period setting of the 1920s, but the first change he made was also the
most radical: he replaced narrator Francis Wayland Thurston with Elizabeth
Thurston Wayland – heiress, adventuress and noted archaeologist. She was a
liberated woman who was just as at home dancing to hot jazz as she was to
deciphering hieroglyphics in the reading room of the British Museum.
"After
her great-uncle’s mysterious death, she acquires his files on the Cthulhu cult
and deciphers the pictographs on the relief made by the artist Wilcox. Not only
does she learn of the original events in the story, but that those events are a
prelude for another rising: the pictographs are a sort of calendar or
timetable, and Cthulhu’s next appearance is in a matter of weeks.
"Elizabeth
is the sort of woman who has no hesitation about flying down to New Orleans on
a biplane to enlist the aid of the retired police inspector John Legrasse. The
shy, milquetoast, artist Wilcox accompanies her too, and finds himself
emboldened by the fearless Elizabeth. And of course, along the way, the
followers of Cthulhu continually threaten and thwart them.
"From
New Orleans, the threesome sail to Australia, where they plan to set out to
meet Cthulhu and send the monstrous thing back to its watery tomb. To do so,
Dad stole (or borrowed) Yog-Sothoth and the Shining Trapezohedron from other
Lovecraft stories, the former as a nemesis to Cthulhu and the latter as a means
of bringing them together.
"Yog-Sothoth
dispatches Cthulhu and the sunken city sinks again, but not before Legrasse is
killed and the dreams of humanity are profoundly unsettled by visions of
unworldly horror.
"In
the end, the victory is at best a bitter triumph. Cthulhu’s retreat is
temporary, and the influence of the monster is already being manifest in
Germany and Italy through the spread of fascism. The world will never be the
same. Elizabeth and Wilcox, though romantically inclined, go their separate
ways.
"In
Dad’s hands, “The Call of Cthulhu” was transformed from an antiquarian’s
nightmare to, as Dad called the project, Doc Savage Meets H. P. Lovecraft."
Encountering these lines again, I thought: Cool! What I wouldn't do to see what this screenplay would have been like! Imagine, the time is about 1969 -- no plethora of strong female characters. My first choice for casting Elizabeth Thurston Wayland would be Diana Rigg (of course). 1969 -- looking back on the late 1920s. The world is changing in so many ways. The revival of interest in Lovecraft would have been in its infancy.
Wait a minute: the screenplay for the The Call of Cthulhu is fictional. The screenwriter is fictional. You invented them. If you're ever going to see that screenplay, you're going to have to write it yourself.
Well, I don't have time to write a whole screenplay, but I began to wonder if I couldn't create a scene that might help describe where the difference lies between the original story and Andrew's version.
So, I imagined this scene, early on in the story: Elizabeth Wayland has arrived at the home of Wilcox, the artist, to ask him about the bas relief he made, and to the account of his dreams found in Professor Angell's papers. Wilcox is intimidated by this confident, "modern" woman, but he shares the story of his nightmares and all the strange things he heard and saw. He also hands to Elizabeth his own account of the experience. Wilcox's opening lines are same as the opening sentences of Lovecraft's "The Call of Cthulhu." In some regards, Wilcox is conceived as a kind of Lovecraft surrogate -- if not the one we find in the biographies, the one that filled our imaginations in the late 1960s.
Here's Elizabeth's reaction:
ELIZABETH:
[Opens
manuscript] What is this rot? [Reads] 'We live on a placid island of ignorance
in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant we should voyage
far.' [puts down manuscript] Do you really believe this drivel, Mr.
Wilcox?
WILCOX:
Miss Wayland,
if you had seen --
ELIZABETH:
Seen?
WILCOX:
Well, what I dreamed
--
ELIZABETH:
Dreamed, then.
You had a bad dream, therefore you believe the world is doomed.
WILCOX:
Not a
bad dream, Miss Wayland. The bad dream -- the ne plus ultra
of bad dreams! A bad dream for the ages!
ELIZABETH:
Mr. Wilcox,
you have no more to base your morbid fatalism upon than a dream. I grant you
that there is much to be said for the influence of dreams. But for you to back
away in fear, to embrace ignorance, to abdicate your reason
in the face of a threat -- a threat you believe may not simply bring about your
own end, but the end of humanity itself --
WILCOX:
Miss Wayland
--
ELIZABETH:
[takes up
manuscript again] ' . . . some day the piecing together of dissociated
knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality . . . that we shall
either go mad from the revelation or flee . . . into the peace and safety of a
new dark age.' [throws manuscript across the room]
WILCOX:
Without
context, it does sound cowardly --
ELIZABETH:
Your words, Mr
Wilcox.
WILCOX:
You have not
seen --
ELIZABETH:
I have seen
this! [holds up the bas relief] I have seen a dozen accounts collected by my
great-uncle. I do not know what you have seen, Mr. Wilcox, but I will tell you
this: before I crawl off into some hidden corner and await the darkness I will
find out what is at the cause of this cancerous madness. I will find out and --
if I can -- send it back to the hell where it came from.
WILCOX:
Miss Wayland,
have you any notion of the danger --
ELIZABETH:
Even if I
didn’t, Mr. Wilcox, it wouldn’t matter. I have experienced my share of dangers.
I will seek out this cult and the object of its adoration. Do you know why?
WILCOX:
Because . . .
well, because . . . [shrugs] No.
ELIZABETH:
[Smiling]
Because I am curious, Mr. Wilcox. Not duty, not honor, not courage. Curiosity.
I want to know. Life is knowledge. Life is danger.
WILCOX:
So is death.
ELIZABETH:
You plan to
escape death?
WILCOX:
There are
worse things than death.
ELIZABETH:
I know one
thing worse than death – it’s not having lived at all.
[WILCOX looks
away]
ELIZABETH:
[Still
smiling] Mr Wilcox – How would you like –
[WILCOX looks
back at ELIZABETH, but says nothing]
ELIZABETH:
[Smiling even
more intensely – alluringly] – how would like, for once, to live?
[WILCOX stares
back, speechless]
CUT TO
EXT. AIRFIELD
OUTSIDE OF PROVIDENCE
[ELIZABETH is dressed
in aviator’s jumpsuit and leather helmet as she strides out onto the runway toward
a waiting biplane. WILCOX trails behind, apprehensively, in street clothes with
the exception of a leather jacket. He is having trouble donning his leather helmet
– the goggles keep falling down.]
ELIZABETH:
Have you ever flown,
Mr. Wilcox?
WILCOX:
[raises goggles]
Not under these conditions.
ELIZABETH:
Under what conditions
have you flown, then?
WILCOX:
Well, the pilot
was . . . a man!
And so on. One thing I like about the interaction between Elizabethand Wilcox, other than the story now having some relationships develop through the course of the story, is that it questions Lovecraft's premise about the piecing together of "dissociated knowledge." Is humanity better off wallowing in its ignorance or seeking out knowledge, even aggressively? This isn't "revisionist" thinking, but a logical dialectic. The inclusion of Elizabeth Wayland introduces an added depth to the proceedings, not diminishing Lovecraft's fictional reality but validating it -- by continually challenging the premises of his traditionally male, tradtionally white, traditionally westernized narrators.
Not to mention being able to see Diana Rigg battling monsters in a biplane.
I hope perhaps someday we'll be able to see the entirety of this screenplay surface. You never know what might be found in the back cellars of my brain.
Rich, you have to finish this script! :) I want to see a movie of this. I wonder if Scarlett Johanson could play the Elizabeth role (though it would be excellent to see the Avengers era Diana Rigg in it).
ReplyDeleteThat last exchange is great.
The Dark Place: An "all is lost" event causes hero to retreat or happens due to a retreat. The point where the character sees what the things he has been doing are not working. Because of own flaws, Hero failed, but he learns from them, faces his deepest fear and starts trying to overcome inner challenges standing in his way. Hero make changes to himself, to his plan, making a decision that forces the resolution of the story, transitioning him from warrior to hell-bent selfless hero. It also is known as Energetic Marker 3, Dark Night of the Soul, Abyss and Revelation, Plot Point Two, Act Two Climax, The Major Assault, Death Experience, Rock Bottom, The Ordeal, The Crisis, Big Change, Epiphany, Inmost Cave, and Crisis. The hero comes at last to a dangerous place, often deep underground, where the object of the quest should be hidden. The tension should be at the highest point, and this should be the decisive turning point. You must convince the audience that their worst fears are going to come true. all is lost
ReplyDelete