Showing posts with label e-books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label e-books. Show all posts

Monday, December 30, 2013

A Winter's Tale and a Happy New Year


Just a brief post this time, since I'm allegedly busy working on all sorts of stuff. But I wanted to let you know that my short story, "The Ambiguities," is featured this week on the excellent podcast site, Tales to Terrify. If you're reading this after the week it's been posted, the site has an extensive and rewarding archive. As usual, they have done a beautiful job with the reading and presentation. I can't ask for more.

Well, maybe I can ask for more. This story, and the novelette "Surfaces" that Tales to Terrify featured on another podcast a while back, are available in a Kindle e-book, Surfaces . . . and Symbols, available here.

"The Ambiguities" works for this time of year. It's set in the winter, during a snowstorm, and the narrator is trying to make a flight to California. Her local airport in Madison is closed. The airport in Milwaukee is closed. She gets on a Greyhound to head down to O'Hare, and that's where things get interesting. I'm looking out the window now and the snow is falling. The temperature is dropping. What better time to listen to (or read) a tale of peril set out on the linear wasteland of I-94?

I'm a lousy salesman. This year, with three mini e-books out, I have managed to make just under ten dollars, which is to say I am not about to become the Charles Foster Kane of e-publishing. So be it. I know that, in this Brave New World, all us writers are supposed to become salespeople and marketing whizzes and two-faced, glad-handing self promoters. 

If I were that good at those tasks, I probably wouldn't be writing.

Let's put it this way: I am one of those persons for whom it is hard enough simply to be a good writer. I'll be happy to settle for that, if I can.

A new year will be starting soon. I wish you all the best. 2013 has been an interesting year for me. It's had its moments, though I can't say I'll be sorry to see it go. I have novel to finish, a couple of novellas and a couple of short stories. And if I can sell 'em in 2014 I'll be a lot merrier a year from now than I am now.

In spite of my grumping, I remain hopeful. The beautiful thing about hope is that it doesn't cost a dime. It's all that other junk that's expensive. Hope is about the only thing left I can afford.

May the new year ambush us with joy and amaze us with sympathy.




Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Every Draft is a New Universe: Writing “Last One Close the Door”


This is a piece I plan to include in another little e-book that’s almost ready, called Through the Brightening Air, which will contain my stories “Last One Close the Door” and “The Button.” I’m doing these forewords (or afterwords – I haven’t decided) as little extras, so you’ll get something more than an old, reprinted story for your three bucks worth of electrons.

At first, I was going to delay this post a day and write something about the people I’ve recently lost or am losing – Delphyne Woods back in September, and today word reached me that Andrea Dubnick passed away. And a colleague of mine at Columbia, Arnie Raife, is in hospice. These are all good people, and I want to share the few memories I have of them. But there’s a heaviness that comes with loss, and I still can’t come to terms with it.

I will say that today I received word that Windycon, will have a memorial for Delphyne on Saturday afternoon. The Art Show will also have a special showing of her work.

And, I wasn’t planning on having a special dedication in the e-book, but the other story, “The Button,” is so much about the Red Lion Pub and the Twilight Tales reading series, and Andrea did so much for “TT” – and she edited so many of the Twilight Tales chapbooks, including the first edition of Tales of the Red Lion, I have to dedicate the book to her now.

 

Somewhere back in my undergraduate years I started up a story called “The Small Town Theater Owner.” I can’t say it was “the usual thing” – it was the usual thing for me: angst in the night – worn, grubby urban landscapes and lonely, alienated protagonists struggling for human contact. Mr. Thompson, the theater owner, lost between a world of dreams and an all-too-real world of diminished expectations and decay.

We were all into angst in those days, by “we” I mean all the young serious young men of late adolescence, of an intellectual/aesthetic bent – all six of us. I think we all met in the same old church basement coffee house while everyone else was out having a good time.

I could have buried that story as I did so many of the stories I started in the mid-1970s, but there was an appeal to the location: the little neighborhood movie theater, the bright marquee, the fading maroon carpeting, the lonely little candy counter, the ubiquitous smell of popcorn, the dark auditorium with the sticky concrete floor, the worn seats, the wilted nicotine-colored curtains around the damaged screen.

And overhead, the light from the projection booth, like a light from heaven shining down on a world in sore need of redemption.

And the movies. Always the movies. From Tomb of Ligeia to Battle Beneath the Earth; from the sublime to the ridiculous.

I don’t know how many drafts I went through on that story. I literally “went to school” on that it. Paul Pekin, who was teaching at Columbia College in those days, ran me through the opening paragraphs and showed me how I was using a first-person narrator while most of the observations in the opening were those you’d expect from a third-person narrator.

Now, the sensible student would have just changed the whole story from first- to third-person narrator. That’s what a sensible student would have done. I re-imagined the thing with the first-person in mind. Complete rewrite.

Then I rewrote the rewrite. And re-wrote the rewritten rewrite.

Six or seven years later, I was still sticking the latest version of “The Small Town Theater Owner” into a 10x13 envelope, with room for the 9x12 return envelope which, for six or seven years, the editors always utilized.

When I told people about the story, they always seemed to like the subject matter. I’m from a generation that grew up going to the movies at little neighborhood places: the Brighton, the Marquette, the Colony, the Hi-Way, the Coral, the Midwest … Theater chains made their incursion into the independent market in those days. There was a “multiplex” in the Ford City shopping center – three screens. The Evergreen Plaza shopping center had two theaters – “Cinema One” and “Cinema Two.” It seemed pretty classy to a young kid, and it was designed with all the touches that made the 1960s version of “modern” architecture distinctive – not like the stacks of twenty-odd boxes with seats and projection booths that showed up a decade or two later, one indistinguishable from the other.

Half my childhood memories consist of movies. The other half are of those little theaters.

I know I’m not the only one.

But the problem with “The Small Town Theater Owner” was this: it had no reason to exist. It had an emotional center, the sense of loss and the sense of dreams abandoned, lost in a morass of one’s heritage and address. The setting is there. The characters are there. The trumps of doom are waiting to play over the ruins of the Alma Theater – but why? Not ‘why the place or people?’ but why the story?

I didn’t have a necessary or sufficient answer for that one. I didn’t give up on the story, but it took some years until I could answer the question.

I had to go back to science fiction to find it.

As I have said many times before, my undergraduate training in fiction writing consisted of many instructors trying, with the best intentions, to beat the science fiction out of me. Graduate school picked up the truncheon, but it was too late. Blame my wife. Blame Delphyne Woods. Blame Algis Budrys.

Blame them all.

But blame me first.

I hung around the science fiction paperback racks at the Kroch’s and Brentano’s downtown like an angel thrown out of paradise, or a child banished from the playground. I picked up The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction regularly again; I read the other sf magazines a bit more irregularly, but I tried to keep my eye on what was being done. Someone out there – everyone, perhaps – was having fun. And I wanted to join them.

And eventually I did.

Near the end of the 1980s – the very late 1980s, like 1991 – I was reading a lot about particle physics and theories of multiple universes. I especially enjoyed Rudy Rucker’s The Fourth Dimension.

And before Stephen Hawking, there was Heinz Pagels.

I combed through The Cosmic Code a dozen times. Now, Pagels himself, as I recall, was fairly skeptical about the notion of multiple/parallel universes, but not entirely dismissive.

What fascinated me about this notion of universes beyond our immediate residence plays into that sfnal notion of “literalizing the metaphor.” Writers create alternate universes all the time. What if some of these universes were real?

Well, they are real – real for us, the writers. And it’s fun to work with them, because intrinsic to the notion of an exponentially expanding pattern of realities is another notion very dear to the core of much science fiction: that what is here is not the only way things can be.

“It does not have to be this way.”

I wrote up a draft that I kept under 5,000 words. I kept the word length down because I wanted to have the story critiqued at the Chicon V writing workshops in 1991. The critiques were sort of what I expected. Hard science fiction writers can’t stand multiple universes and do their best to pull the plug on them whenever possible. Why was I using a teenaged narrator? And worse, a female teenaged narrator? Why didn’t I explain more about this strange organization that used these young people to survey and police the inter-dimensional activities in other universes? Why didn’t I explain more about why Mr. Thompson abandoned physics and became a theater owner? Another sharp spear thrown at my story: multiple universe stories had “been done.” What was new to say in this story?

All the answers were in the story, but the workshop readers were missing them, so it seemed, or they just weren’t interested.

It had been my policy when I sent a manuscript out to be critiqued, that I also send the story to a magazine, sort of as an “insurance policy” or reality check. Very often, the critiquers in such workshops are very smart people who know every possible reason why your story doesn’t work, though they themselves can’t write a saleable story. This doesn’t preclude their being right very often, but just in case their judgments were based less on what I’d done (my story) and more on what I didn’t do (write something not like me, but more like the stories these critiquers enjoyed and were familiar with), I wanted a comment from an editor – someone who was actually in a position to buy my story – to balance off the critiquing crew.

In this case I chose Kim Mohan, who at the time was the editor of Amazing Stories. I’d sold a story to the previous editor, “A Man Makes a Machine,” that ran in 1990. So for once I included a cover letter that stated I was fairly certain this story would need more work, but I wanted to know if this version looked interesting to him in its current state. If not, I’d just move on. If it did look interesting, I’d send him a revised version as soon as I’d finished with the workshop.

Kim was a great editor to work with. In reply to my cover letter, he said he’d withhold judgment until he saw my revised version. That version came in a little over short story length, “novelette” length, and most of the rough edges I had to leave in the workshop version were effectively smoothed out in the revision.

Amazing sent the contract back pretty quickly. I couldn’t be more pleased. The story may not have been a prize winner, but it floated, like all short stories and bars of ivory soap should. I was planning to write more stories set in that same universe (or universes) – did write more (see “Auteur Theory” and a few others, like “The Unremembered Gate” and The Last Labyrinth, are still on the launching pad), and I finally had my small town theater owner down.

Amazing Stories was a great magazine in those days. It had gone from digest-size to full-size, and glossy. Each story got a full-color illustration. The illustrator for “Last One …,” Mark Maxwell, did an incredible job. He got the sleeping projectionist in, with a bunch of posters lining the booth (including the gloriously-named forgotten Roger Corman opus, Swamp Women), the projector and the light emanating from it, that square of light that catches on the glass from the booth window, and some errant particles – as if from a ring accelerator – flying right out of the illustration. It’s a beauty and one of my favorite illustrations for one of my stories that I’ve ever seen.

Yes, it was a splendid thing to have a story in Amazing in those days.

The only problem was that nobody read it.

Even among the fans – fandom, for some odd reason (or maybe not so odd) preferred to think of Amazing as doomed from the get-go and were so determined that their prediction come true, few of them bought the magazine themselves. It was one of the things I discovered in later years about fandom: collectively, they like nothing better than large quantities of cheesy and cheese-flavored snacks, chocolate in quantity rather than quality, and predicting the failure of well-intentioned projects. So, with great fiction by George Zebrowski, Robert Silverberg, Tanya Huff, Greg Benford, Harry Turtledove and dozens of others to ignore, I was lucky to have my story ignored at all.

“Last One Close the Door” takes place in a town where the factories have closed, the downtown area has been decimated. Twenty years later (I’m writing this in 2013), I can’t say all that much has changed for many towns and communities. If anything, things have gotten worse.

What does it say for a science fiction author that only his most depressing speculations turn out right? I have no cell phones or compact computer devices in the story, and their absence may date my vision. But the loss of all those little movie houses – along with their function as being a sort of avenue for dreams for all the residents in the little neighborhoods and towns where they reside, that part I got right. Different avenues may exist, new media has come to prominence, but I can’t help feeling the loss. I won’t, I can’t, say the new media is any better or worse than the neighborhood theaters, but I’d feel better in a world where we can have the option, the choice, of indulging in one over the other.

Which is to say, I miss being able to slip into the Brighton Theater on a Thursday night, after a rough day, and catch a double feature in a nearly-empty mini-palace, while I muse over the relative values of the “real” universe over its imaginative rivals occupying the upraised plane of light between my eyes and the gritty, glass-bead-surface of the movie screen.

Whatever else I have to say, short of relating all sorts of little anecdotes about my excursions into the dark – those soiled and seedy little places where we all stare straight ahead at the screen as if it is the window through which we will arrive at our destiny (and whatever “destiny” may be) – is perhaps better expressed in the story.

If you were born after the heyday of the “nabes,” I hope “Last One Close the Door” helps convey a little of their flavor.

 

Saturday, August 3, 2013

The Andrew Ulaszek Cthulhu Screenplay

Sometimes I surprise myself.

While editing another batch of stories for e-book publication, I ran into this section of "The Cthulhu Orthodontist," which I wrote for the anthology Cthulhu and the Coeds: Or, Kids and Squids. It's a story about how the divorced father of the young teenager writes two screenplays to help raise money for her orthodontist bill. Sounds simple enough, but it's a story about stories and storytelling and how the making of stories affects our lives in all sorts of ways at all sorts of levels.

This passage explains what Andrew Ulaszek, the dad, writes when he believes that the announced production of "The Call of Cthulhu" is legit and that macabre master Mario Bava is slated to direct:

"Dad kept the period setting of the 1920s, but the first change he made was also the most radical: he replaced narrator Francis Wayland Thurston with Elizabeth Thurston Wayland – heiress, adventuress and noted archaeologist. She was a liberated woman who was just as at home dancing to hot jazz as she was to deciphering hieroglyphics in the reading room of the British Museum.
"After her great-uncle’s mysterious death, she acquires his files on the Cthulhu cult and deciphers the pictographs on the relief made by the artist Wilcox. Not only does she learn of the original events in the story, but that those events are a prelude for another rising: the pictographs are a sort of calendar or timetable, and Cthulhu’s next appearance is in a matter of weeks.
"Elizabeth is the sort of woman who has no hesitation about flying down to New Orleans on a biplane to enlist the aid of the retired police inspector John Legrasse. The shy, milquetoast, artist Wilcox accompanies her too, and finds himself emboldened by the fearless Elizabeth. And of course, along the way, the followers of Cthulhu continually threaten and thwart them.
"From New Orleans, the threesome sail to Australia, where they plan to set out to meet Cthulhu and send the monstrous thing back to its watery tomb. To do so, Dad stole (or borrowed) Yog-Sothoth and the Shining Trapezohedron from other Lovecraft stories, the former as a nemesis to Cthulhu and the latter as a means of bringing them together.
"Yog-Sothoth dispatches Cthulhu and the sunken city sinks again, but not before Legrasse is killed and the dreams of humanity are profoundly unsettled by visions of unworldly horror.
"In the end, the victory is at best a bitter triumph. Cthulhu’s retreat is temporary, and the influence of the monster is already being manifest in Germany and Italy through the spread of fascism. The world will never be the same. Elizabeth and Wilcox, though romantically inclined, go their separate ways.
"In Dad’s hands, “The Call of Cthulhu” was transformed from an antiquarian’s nightmare to, as Dad called the project, Doc Savage Meets H. P. Lovecraft."
 
Encountering these lines again, I thought: Cool! What I wouldn't do to see what this screenplay would have been like! Imagine, the time is about 1969 -- no plethora of strong female characters. My first choice for casting Elizabeth Thurston Wayland would be Diana Rigg (of course). 1969 -- looking back on the late 1920s. The world is changing in so many ways. The revival of interest in Lovecraft would have been in its infancy.
Wait a minute: the screenplay for the The Call of Cthulhu is fictional. The screenwriter is fictional. You invented them. If you're ever going to see that screenplay, you're going to have to write it yourself.
Well, I don't have time to write a whole screenplay, but I began to wonder if I couldn't create a scene that might help describe where the difference lies between the original story and Andrew's version.
So, I imagined this scene, early on in the story: Elizabeth Wayland has arrived at the home of Wilcox, the artist, to ask him about the bas relief he made, and to the account of his dreams found in Professor Angell's papers. Wilcox is intimidated by this confident, "modern" woman, but he shares the story of his nightmares and all the strange things he heard and saw. He also hands to Elizabeth his own account of the experience. Wilcox's opening lines are same as the opening sentences of Lovecraft's "The Call of Cthulhu." In some regards, Wilcox is conceived as a kind of Lovecraft surrogate -- if not the one we find in the biographies, the one that filled our imaginations in the late 1960s.
Here's Elizabeth's reaction:
 
ELIZABETH:
[Opens manuscript] What is this rot? [Reads] 'We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant we should voyage far.' [puts down manuscript] Do you really believe this drivel, Mr. Wilcox?
 
WILCOX:
Miss Wayland, if you had seen --
 
ELIZABETH:
Seen?
 
WILCOX:
Well, what I dreamed --
 
ELIZABETH:
Dreamed, then. You had a bad dream, therefore you believe the world is doomed.
 
WILCOX:
Not a bad dream, Miss Wayland. The bad dream -- the ne plus ultra of bad dreams! A bad dream for the ages!
 
ELIZABETH:
Mr. Wilcox, you have no more to base your morbid fatalism upon than a dream. I grant you that there is much to be said for the influence of dreams. But for you to back away in fear, to embrace ignorance, to abdicate your reason in the face of a threat -- a threat you believe may not simply bring about your own end, but the end of humanity itself --
 
WILCOX:
Miss Wayland --
 
ELIZABETH:
[takes up manuscript again] ' . . . some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality . . . that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee . . . into the peace and safety of a new dark age.' [throws manuscript across the room]
 
WILCOX:
Without context, it does sound cowardly --
 
ELIZABETH:
Your words, Mr Wilcox.
 
WILCOX:
You have not seen --
 
ELIZABETH:
I have seen this! [holds up the bas relief] I have seen a dozen accounts collected by my great-uncle. I do not know what you have seen, Mr. Wilcox, but I will tell you this: before I crawl off into some hidden corner and await the darkness I will find out what is at the cause of this cancerous madness. I will find out and -- if I can -- send it back to the hell where it came from.
 
WILCOX:
Miss Wayland, have you any notion of the danger --
 
ELIZABETH:
Even if I didn’t, Mr. Wilcox, it wouldn’t matter. I have experienced my share of dangers. I will seek out this cult and the object of its adoration. Do you know why?
 
WILCOX:
Because . . . well, because . . . [shrugs] No.
 
ELIZABETH:
[Smiling] Because I am curious, Mr. Wilcox. Not duty, not honor, not courage. Curiosity. I want to know. Life is knowledge. Life is danger.
 
WILCOX:
So is death.
 
ELIZABETH:
You plan to escape death?
 
WILCOX:
There are worse things than death.
 
ELIZABETH:
I know one thing worse than death – it’s not having lived at all.
 
[WILCOX looks away]
 
ELIZABETH:
[Still smiling] Mr Wilcox – How would you like –
 
[WILCOX looks back at ELIZABETH, but says nothing]
 
ELIZABETH:
[Smiling even more intensely – alluringly] – how would like, for once, to live?
 
[WILCOX stares back, speechless]
 
CUT TO
 
EXT. AIRFIELD OUTSIDE OF PROVIDENCE
 
[ELIZABETH is dressed in aviator’s jumpsuit and leather helmet as she strides out onto the runway toward a waiting biplane. WILCOX trails behind, apprehensively, in street clothes with the exception of a leather jacket. He is having trouble donning his leather helmet – the goggles keep falling down.]
 
ELIZABETH:
Have you ever flown, Mr. Wilcox?
 
WILCOX:
[raises goggles] Not under these conditions.
 
ELIZABETH:
Under what conditions have you flown, then?
 
WILCOX:
Well, the pilot was . . . a man!
 
And so on. One thing I like about the interaction between Elizabethand Wilcox, other than the story now having some relationships develop through the course of the story, is that it questions Lovecraft's premise about the piecing together of "dissociated knowledge." Is humanity better off wallowing in its ignorance or seeking out knowledge, even aggressively? This isn't "revisionist" thinking, but a logical dialectic. The inclusion of Elizabeth Wayland introduces an added depth to the proceedings, not diminishing Lovecraft's fictional reality but validating it -- by continually challenging the premises of his traditionally male, tradtionally white, traditionally westernized narrators.
 
Not to mention being able to see Diana Rigg battling monsters in a biplane.
 
I hope perhaps someday we'll be able to see the entirety of this screenplay surface. You never know what might be found in the back cellars of my brain. 
 

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

I Done Done It (my first ebook)

It took me long enough, but I finally went to the Kindle Direct site and posted a mini e-book http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00E7NCCGQ, bringing together my two dark fantasy stories, "Surfaces" and "The Ambiguities." To be followed by three more mini books, the next one containing "Auteur Theory," "The Cthulhu Orthodontist" and "Where We Go." Then, one with "Last One Close the Door" and "The Button." The last one will contain "A Man Makes a Machine" (my first pro sale) and "Getting Along with Larga" (the winner of the first ISFiC Short Story Contest Prize and my "return" to science fiction after my apprenticeship in the literary salt mines).

It's been interesting. KDL says they support Word docs, so I worked in Word, even got fancy. My preview of the e-book doesn't show half the cool stuff I did, and it seems that the KDL format doesn't support the kind of layout I was doing (I threw in an illo preceding the start of each story, as you might in a print book, which would look good, except that the illos were by me, so they didn't look that good anyway). It seems they really want you to focus on the text. I can do that. This first book will look a little messed up, if the preview is any indication. I don't own a Kindle. Go figure. If I sell a few books, first I'll buy a char-dog at Phil's Last Stand on Chicago Avenue, then I'll buy a Kindle. One has one's priorities, you know.

I have given myself the option to make mistakes. Where I came from, the people I came from, you couldn't make mistakes. If you screwed something up you were a screw-up for life. I was a screw-up for life from about third grade. Which is probably why I hesitated so long in getting this first book out, and why I've been suffering a migraine all day. Old wounds run deep. They kind of feel like all-day migraines.

Yeah, I've got a Nebula. Yeah, I've had stuff in F&SF and Amazing and Hartwell's Year's Best SF series. When you go to KDL, you're self-publishing, and you feel like you're self-publishing, because that's what you're doing. It feels a little funny, but it also feels kind of interesting. I never started a small press, though I was always interested in doing so (though not for publishing my own stuff). The printing and storage costs were always unaffordable. The ISBNs are still unaffordable. But hey, I can go back. I can fix things. I can do the next one better.

Speaking of "doing the next one better": it's a weird experience reading your old published work, especially when you feel the urge to jump in and revise it. Well, there's nothing wrong in revising. Many writers have done just that when they prepared their old work for new publication (or in this case "publication" -- in some respects this still feels a little like a game instead of "REAL" publishing, because . . . it isn't "real" publishing). It's probably not a good idea to do too much revising. Save it for the next story. It's been my experience, so far, that I wasn't half as bad a writer as I thought I would discover -- though I wasn't as good as writer as I know I can be now.

That last sentence sounds suspiciously like the kind of thing a writer tells him/her-self when you know you have to give yourself that little inspirational sermon just to keep from throwing all your printouts out the nearest window (you can be fined for littering if you do that).

When you've been fighting a migraine all day, that can happen. Then, if you really want to mess yourself up, when your wife sends you off to search the shelves for the most recent edition of The Elements of Style, and you end up pulling a couple of story collections off the shelves, and you start reading (because, hey, the book is right there in your hands) some of Greg Frost's stories from Attack of the Jazz Giants, or something from Howard Waldrop's Things Will Never Be the Same . . . and you were already reading all these great stories in the latest Dozois-edited Year's Best Science Fiction collection for your fall semster reading list, that little voice in your head, that little editor, starts to shout at you, "You are such SHIT! How could you even think you could write anything even passably competent?"

And whatever happened to that Elements of Style anyway? I can hear Pam shouting from the dining room.

So, here I am, with an e-book, and now I'm supposed to go annoy people on Facebook and ask them to plug it, or post links, or do all the sorts of things that when I see other people doing it I just want to turn away to save them embarrassment (unless they're really good at it, and some folks really are).

It's been that kind of day.

But hey -- I've got an e-book! And that's one of things I set out to do this summer (along with starting a blog). I'm making some kind of progress.

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Some book cover possibilities

I'm too worn out to write much today, so I'm going to see if I can post some pictures successfully. They're mockups for the covers of the ebooks (or is that "e-books"?) I'm putting together, and an illustration for one of the stories ("The Ambiguities," originally published in Hell in the Heartland). I'm not sure it will help sell the books that they don't much look like the other covers I've seen, but there's a certain sameness to many ebook covers I'd like to avoid. Let me know if you think they stink, or if they might be salvageable if I do this or that.

Also: Please let me know if you think putting "Nebula winning author of Bronte's Egg'" on the cover sounds stupid. One part of me says I should put something like that on the cover because it might sell more books. Another part of me says I'm just being conceited.

Other than these covers, I spent some time changing underscorings to italics in three of the stories for the books (and figuring out some other search-and-replace relics left over from an Alexandria Digital version of one), slipped in a little detail I missed in the second paragraph of "Dixon's Road," and mapped out a change to another old story I'm working on for the saur collection. It's a story called "Agent" (unless you or I can think of a better name), and it includes a scene where several girls encounter an irascible stegosaur named Agnes in a toy store. The story is also supposed to explain Reggie a bit more -- where it came from and why it might have gotten into some trouble.

I also spent some time looking over recent stories in "Year's Best" anthologies, looking for good pieces with unreliable narrators. It's for something Marty Halpern is working on. The one thing I've discovered is that it's not so easy to figure out just what constitutes an "unreliable" narrator. Some narrators are just being deceptive. But "unreliable"? Unless it's someone like the narrator of "The Tell-Tale Heart," it's a judgment call. But I'll turn over the few I think might qualify to Marty and see what he thinks.



Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Introduction to "Auteur Theory," Part One

Yes, yes, I know I should be working on new stories. I'm getting there, honest. But I'm still being lured into the whole world of e-books (or should that be "ebooks"? Shows you how little I know about this world). Hey, I used to have some of my old stories with Alexandria Digital Literature. Remember how well that worked out? Okay, let's not remember that ...

I've been working out ways of packaging the stories, of putting out the equivalent of little chapbooks, pairing the stories one way or another. The weekend of Father's Day it occurred to me that three of my stories featured dads. So I said, "Okay, how about we put "Auteur Theory," "Where We Go" and "The Cthulhu Orthodontist" together. That will be one book. And maybe I'll write an introduction for it, explain where the character of Andrew came about."

So I started working on the introduction and got this far. I wouldn't ordinarily bother you with it, but I'm still playing around with committing acts of bloggery. I'm sort of intrigued as to how far I might go. If I ever manage to make a point I might even learn a thing or two about my creative process or lack thereof.

"About the time I was in fourth grade, maybe earlier but certainly no later, I invented a father.

"Not that I didn’t have a father already. It’s just that I needed another one. One who wasn’t so – not to get too deep into it at this time – so … 'real.'

"Kids invent imaginary friends. Often, they invent other kids – kids who exhibit the qualities they desire in themselves, or who represent some part of themselves they cannot or will not express. I don’t know too many people who talk about their imaginary friends, but I’m sure many more had them than will ’fess up to it now, even among the people of my tribe – writers.

"My imaginary friends were all adults. I was no fool (an idiot, yes, but not a complete fool). I knew who had all the power and where all the fun was to be had. Adults will disagree with that assessment. I disagree with it myself, now.

"I claim to be no better or worse than the next stunted, insecure, psychically-injured-down-to-the-root-of-the-soul-type kid who grew up in a cultural desert of bungalows and raised ranch houses of the mid-twentieth century. All I know is that my fantasies had a slightly odd curve to them.

"You see, if I went to a movie like, let’s say, The Time Machine, I didn’t come back wanting to be the character Rod Taylor played, the time traveler rescuing the helpless Eloi and fighting off the scary Morlocks (or, as we used to call them, Morons). I wanted to be the guy who made the movie about the time traveler rescuing Eloi and battling Morlocks.

When I read a book, I didn’t want to be the hero of the story; I wanted to be the guy who wrote the story, or a story very like it.

"And so with the comic books at the Rexall. And so with music. And so with paintings in the Art Institute. I didn’t know much about art – Hell, I didn’t know about anything. You couldn’t get dumber than me without being scraped up, placed into a clay pot and watered twice a week. I didn’t know a thing about art – except that it was made.

"Made. It didn’t fall out of the sky. It wasn’t the product of air masses or sunspots. Even if you wanted to attribute art to a godlike entity, an intermediary did all the grunt work. Art is made.

"And I wanted to make it.

"Not that I knew how. I didn’t even know how to make my bed. I didn’t know how to carry numbers in arithmetic. I didn’t know how to bring home the correct change if my mother sent me to the store for milk (she did that once and once only – in my household, you had but one chance to do anything; if you screwed up you were forever labeled a screw-up and never, ever, trusted again to do anything of importance).

"But I knew I wanted to make some kind of art. Movies. Books. Paintings. Music. Whatever. I wanted to tell stories. Nothing could have been more important. In second grade, I had to fill out a questionnaire and one of the questions had been about what I wanted to be when I grew up. I ran out of space somewhere between doctor and paratrooper. But if I had filled out that form two years later, I most likely would have limited myself to movie maker, writer and, running a close third, paleontologist (look at it this way: if I wrote books about dinosaurs I would be telling their stories. Scientists can be storytellers, too).

"How to get there? I couldn’t see how, though I was very willing to try. But … to make it as plain as I possibly can, kids from the Southwest Side of Chicago did not grow up to be movie makers, or writers, or visual artists. Kids from the Southwest Side grew up to work in factories. Or drive trucks. Or pump gas (when such jobs could be had). That’s what I was given to believe. If you had high aspirations, you could apply yourself so that maybe one day you would wear a white shirt and a tie to work every day and not carry your lunch in a metal container. You’d be working for a company that manufactured screws, or cables, or plastic shims that would fit under your Formica-topped kitchen table. Or you’d be selling insurance, or keeping books for the company that made those ever-so-essential shims. But not much more than that. Nothing wrong with such a life. One does what one needs to do. Shims are valuable objects, easily worth their weight in … shims. That just wasn’t where I wanted to go.

"From where I stood, at my age, weight and height, the future looked like a still sea of death, smooth as glass.

"Of course I fantasized. Of course I invented a person who could do the things I couldn’t do. Of course I often imagined I was him and he was me.

"And even when I grew older, old enough to leave behind much of the world I created inside my head, every now and then my thoughts returned to that guy.

"He became the basis for Andrew Ulaszek, the retired movie maker of “Auteur Theory.” He showed up again in “The Cthulhu Orthodontist,” and once more in “Where We Go.” He’s the father of one of my most frequent narrators (see “Surfaces” and “The Ambiguities”). The old dude and his family get around.

"I’m not through with him yet.

"Or he’s not through with me.

"What's the deal with that?"